The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee (EPW) has released preliminary information on its blueprint for a two year, $109 billion reauthorization of SAFETEA-LU legislation that would fund highway, bridge, road and rail initiatives at current levels. However, the bill would require the infusion of $12 billion from other sources outside the federal gas tax that have yet to be identified, raising questions about its near-term prospects.
Entitled “Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century� (MAP-21), the bill attempts to give states some longer-term assurance of funding that would enable medium-term planning to occur without reducing funding from current levels. The bill does not include funding for Member requested projects. EPW will hold a hearing on the bill on Thursday to attempt to showcase support for the legislation, which business groups, such as the Chamber of Commerce, as well as highway construction and labor organizations are expected to embrace in order to avoid spending reductions for transportation. A summary of the preliminary information on the bill is included below.
MAP-21 differs starkly from the House Transportation and Infrastructure (T&I) Committee’s blueprint, which provided a six year bill that was fully funded through gas tax revenue – albeit at declining levels due to lower receipts from the gas tax. House T&I Committee Chairman John Mica (R-FL) has promoted his legislation as a realistic path forward given current and future budget constraints and criticized the Senate EPW Committee’s approach as failing to provide the long-term stability to states and the transportation structure that is needed to make good decisions about investment for the long run.
Outlook
The EPW bill is being advanced on a bipartisan basis by EPW Chairwoman Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and Ranking Member James Inhofe (R-OK) which could provide it a leg up as it winds its way through the legislative process. However, given the $12 billion funding shortfall, progress on the bill is contingent on the Finance Committee finding additional funding as well as the Banking Committee acting on the transit title of the legislation, actions which are not expected to occur for the foreseeable future.
Beyond the fate of the Senate EPW bill, it is notable that since its announcement, the House T&I bill released by Chairman Mica has been criticized by T&I Democrats over low funding levels – a break from the bipartisan support the legislation has traditionally enjoyed. This rift within the T&I Committee and between the House and Senate approaches indicates how difficult it may be to gain agreement on the legislation in the coming months.
WSW will be closely monitoring the Senate EPW hearing on MAP-21 tomorrow and tracking developments in the House and Senate in the weeks ahead to advise you on any opportunities that may arise as the bills move forward.
Preliminary Highlights of the Senate MAP-21 Bill